Fill Out a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Template

Fill Out a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Template

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an NCO Evaluation Report specifically designed for the evaluation of Sergeants in the U.S. Army. This form captures essential information regarding an NCO's performance, potential, and professional development over a designated period. Proper completion of this form is crucial for accurate assessment and future career progression within the military.

Modify Da 2166 9 1

The DA 2166-9-1 form is an essential tool for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) within the U.S. Army. This evaluation report, specifically designed for Sergeants, plays a crucial role in assessing an NCO's performance, professionalism, and potential for future assignments. It includes several key sections, such as administrative data, rater authentication, and detailed performance evaluations. The form captures vital information, including the NCO's name, rank, and unit, as well as the evaluation period. Raters and senior raters provide their insights on various attributes, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each section requires thoughtful commentary to support the ratings given. The form also emphasizes the importance of counseling dates and the appeals process, ensuring transparency and accountability. By providing a comprehensive overview of an NCO's capabilities, the DA 2166-9-1 form helps shape career progression and reinforces the Army's commitment to developing its leaders.

Document Information

Fact Name Description
Purpose The DA Form 2166-9-1 is used for the NCO Evaluation Report for the rank of Sergeant (SGT). It assesses the performance and potential of non-commissioned officers.
Governing Regulations This form is governed by Army Regulation (AR) 623-3 and DA Pamphlet (PAM) 623-3, which outline the procedures for evaluating NCOs.
Privacy Act Statement The form includes a Privacy Act Statement, ensuring that personal information is handled in accordance with AR 623-3.
Submission Requirements The form requires various administrative data, including the rated NCO's email address, duty description, and performance evaluations. It must be completed accurately to verify the NCO's performance.

Common PDF Templates

Misconceptions

Misconceptions about the DA 2166 9 1 form can lead to confusion among service members and their evaluators. Here are eight common misunderstandings:

  • It is only for NCOs. While the DA 2166 9 1 form is specifically designed for Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs), it is part of a broader evaluation system that applies to various ranks and positions within the Army.
  • Signatures indicate agreement with the evaluation. The rated NCO's signature verifies the accuracy of administrative data and does not imply agreement or disagreement with the rater's assessments.
  • All evaluations are the same. Each evaluation is unique and tailored to the individual NCO’s performance, responsibilities, and contributions during the rating period.
  • Performance evaluations are solely based on metrics. While quantitative measures like APFT scores are included, qualitative assessments of character, leadership, and potential are also critical components.
  • Senior raters have no influence on the evaluation. Senior raters play a vital role in assessing an NCO's overall potential and provide essential context to the evaluation, which can impact future assignments.
  • The form does not allow for comments. Evaluators are encouraged to provide detailed comments throughout the form, particularly in areas assessing performance and potential.
  • Submitting the form is a one-time process. The evaluation process includes initial and follow-up counseling dates, ensuring ongoing communication about performance and expectations.
  • There is no appeals process. The rated NCO is informed about the appeals process as part of their rights, allowing them to contest any inaccuracies or disagreements regarding their evaluation.

Understanding these misconceptions can help service members navigate the evaluation process more effectively and ensure accurate assessments of their performance and potential.

Dos and Don'ts

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it is important to follow certain guidelines to ensure accuracy and compliance. Here are some key points to consider:

  • Do double-check all personal information for accuracy, including name and SSN.
  • Don't leave any required fields blank; ensure all sections are completed.
  • Do use clear and concise language when describing duties and responsibilities.
  • Don't use abbreviations or jargon that may not be understood by all reviewers.
  • Do sign and date the form in the appropriate sections to validate your submission.
  • Don't submit the form without reviewing it for any errors or inconsistencies.
  • Do keep a copy of the completed form for your records.

Following these guidelines will help ensure that your evaluation report is processed smoothly and accurately.

Key takeaways

Here are key takeaways for filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form:

  • Accurate Information is Crucial: Ensure that all personal and administrative data, including name, SSN, and unit details, are correct. Errors can lead to delays or complications.
  • Understand the Evaluation Process: Familiarize yourself with the evaluation criteria outlined in the form. This includes performance areas such as character, presence, and leadership.
  • Signatures Matter: The rated NCO's signature does not indicate agreement with the evaluation but confirms that the administrative data is accurate. Be aware of this distinction.
  • Utilize Counseling Dates: Document counseling dates accurately. This reflects your commitment to professional development and ensures proper communication between the rater and the rated NCO.
  • Review Before Submission: Always review the completed form for accuracy and completeness. This includes checking all sections, especially performance evaluations and potential assessments.